Richard Widick (IICAT:1/22/18) Pierce Abrahamson (1/22/18)
We are pleased to report that Pierce Abrahamson, University of California, Santa Barbara, has joined IICAT as the Coordinator of the Global Cities Project for the academic year 2017-18.
In January of 2018, Pierce will begin archiving his research on the role of Cities in the struggle over emergent global climate governance.
Using Los Angeles, California as a case study in climate action planning, Pierce will be engaging in this coastal, global city’s struggle to fairly and honestly confront the difficult decisions that cities everywhere are increasingly having to make, especially concerning the distribution of limited resources for mitigation and adaptation in light of the unfolding climate crisis.
Using methods of conflict seeking participatory action research to conduct a theoretical, historical ethnography of the city and it’s climate action panning process, Pierce will be engaging crucial actors charged with charting the city’s difficult path forward.
Stay tuned to this channel as he begins reporting back from his initial explorations and archiving his research here at IICAT.
In time, we hope and expect this page to become a privileged, critical portal into LA’s climate action planning process.
Why study Los Angeles & it’s climate action plan?
21st Century urbanization will be one of the most challenging and tragic institutional transformations of modernity, and perhaps the most fascinating in which to participate and watch, and therefore IICAT places the dynamic emergence of global cities at the center of its analysis.
As financial, cultural, and psychical centers of gravity in the expanding world economic (culture) system, our collective self-understanding of the climate challenge will begin and end with the forces constitutive of and emanating from these cities.
Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle on the west US coast—Chicago and New York. London and Paris and Madrid and Berlin and Rome. Athens! That is the geopolitical historical vector where we will begin, because it tracks the historical path of the western tradition from it roots in ancient Greece to our location in Santa Barbara—from which to move further west and follow the arc leads not further on but back to the old country. What follows is therefore to some extent a self-analysis.
From LA in the late 20th Century as semiotic ground zero ignited in Hollywood and digitized globally from SF’s silicon valley, we enter the new horizon of global horizontal proliferation of connectivity and a new scale of semiological universalism made tactile, for example, in the electric buzz of universal disco heard in the night clubs of global cities, on every continent where the international bourgeoisie remains an authentic expression of the still revolutionary rising class of owners.
But other people in other places might do well to construct their own genealogies, and we look forward to discovering the work of other people in other traditions that likewise appreciate their location in the international climate wars and seek to analyze its function as well as themselves and their local predicaments.
What we can and hope to do here is see the world through our eyes—and get connected with other people who can help us see the world through theirs.
In time this page will reflect our extension of this line of investigation to its fullest philosophical conclusion.
For now we just begin to assemble the following annotated links with which we think it best to engage this scene of urbanization.
See also Davis’s works on Los Angeles (and more): City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, Ecology of Fear, Dead Cities, and Evil Paradises: Dreamworlds of Neoliberalism.
Long Beach, California is part of the LA metropolis at the center of our research, which takes landscape-based, watershed scale approach to constituting its object.
The city has recently undertaken measures to drastically lower its temperatures. The basic idea is more green spaces, more shade, but that means more water, and so it goes. First published at CityLab.
Additional general sources:
See this 2015 report on urbanization in India – data rich look at the future of urbanization.
The following sources for will be invaluable for further investigation:
Also from Foreign Policy, Sassia Saskens “What Makes Global City?” (2012).
The Urbanization and Global Environmental Change (UGEC) project of the United Nations University (UNU), which “seeks to provide a better understanding of the interactions and feedbacks between global environmental change and urbanization at the local, regional, and global scales.” The project officially closed in 2017.
Climate Action Planning for Global Cities. Read the May 2012 MIT report Progress and Challenges in URBAN CLIMATE ADAPTION PLANNING: Results of a Global Survey. Produced by JoAnn Carmin, then MIT Associate Professor of Environmental Policy and Planning. See her 2009 survey instrument Preparing Cities for Climate Change.
Global Flows & Global Cities. This is an archive in which we collect voices articulating the language of Global Flows and Global Cities—a discourse we are studying and trying to fathom by asking the question: what are the dominant tendencies here, and what do they mean for the theory and practice of 21st century urbanization?